Blog

  • Distilling Honey Into Vodka: An Interview with Caledonia Spirits Owner/Distiller Ryan Christiansen

    Years ago when I first heard of – and tried- Barr Hill Gin, it was a revelation. The gin is neutral spirits with added juniper and honey- that's it. The honey brings with it other aromatics from the flora the bees feed on. 

    The gin is made by Caledonia Spirits in Vermont. A recent press release stated: 

    Caledonia Spirits is known best for its flagship gins, but the distillery's Barr Hill Vodka is a truly unique offering within the vodka category. Made entirely from raw northern honey and nothing else (~3000 lbs per batch), it’s distilled only twice – a stark contrast from many of the popular vodkas that get distilled 3-5 (or more) times and filtered to oblivion. Vodka was traditionally thought of as a spirit that became better the more times it was filtered, but doing so leaves a spirit that is completely odorless and tasteless.

    Knowing just how beautiful of an ingredient the raw northern honey is, Caledonia Spirits wanted to flip tradition on its head and create a vodka that retains some of the flavor and aroma from its sugar source. Distilling and filtering it too many times would totally lose the honey flavor, but thanks to Caledonia Spirits’ unique process, the resulting vodka is fragrant and flavorful…yet not sweet at all. The honey tasting notes are very subtle, but they’re present enough to tell you that you’re not having the same neutral-tasting vodka that is so often served. Every year, Caledonia Spirits purchases 60,000-80,000 pounds of raw honey from beekeepers within a 250-mile radius of the distillery.

    Sine then, the brand has released a vodka and a barrel-aged gin.  I hadn't tried the vodka before. It is absolutely waxy almost to the point of greasy, with notes of Honey Nuts Cheerios, and I think I love it. 

     

    Screen Shot 2020-07-29 at 6.22.56 PM

     

    I was given the opportunity to interview Caledonia Spirits Owner/Distiller Ryan Christiansen, so that's just what I did! 

    Is the base of Barr Hill Gin purchased grain neutral spirits (plus honey and juniper)? Or is there distilled honey spirit in it also?

    The base of Barr Hill Gin is grain neutral. It is then distilled in one of our two custom-built botanical extraction stills with Juniper. The spirit is proofed down with raw honey and our water.

     

    Is Barr Hill Vodka 100% distilled from honey or is it a blend of GNS and distilled honey? If a blend can you give an approximate ratio? 

    Barr Hill Vodka is distilled entirely from raw northern honey.

     

    I see several stills in the image on the website – the big pot and a small and tall finishing column. Which set-up do you use to make the gin vs the vodka?  

    Our gin is distilled in Irene and Ramona, two custom-built botanical extraction stills. Our vodka is distilled twice, once through a pot stripping run, then through the column still to 190 proof.

     

    88347072_3058134717532525_8511479553980366848_oImages stolen from Barr Hill.

     

    Is the honey sold by the pound? Is there a standard conversion for pounds of honey to liquid volume? Do you know the liquid volume of honey for the "60,000-80,000 pounds" you buy annually? 

    We purchase our honey by the 55 gallon drum, which holds about 650lbs of honey. In the last year we’ve used over 67,000 lbs to make our spirits. Each bottle of vodka requires 3-4 pounds of raw honey to make. Where we fall in that range from 3-4 depends on the batch size. 

    We do also sell our honey by the pound for use by bartenders and chefs.

     

    For fermenting/distilling honey, do you dilute to a certain standardized sugar level (and do you measure this in BRIX) before fermentation? Can you say what that level is? 

    We pitch yeast at 24 brix, and ferment to dry.

     

    How long does fermentation take? I imagine it's super fast. 

    Honey fermentations are much slower than grain fermentations, usually about 2-3 weeks to dry.

     

    Do you temperature control the fermentation? Do you let it go longer into a malolactic fermentation? If not, is there a reason, such as it becomes disgusting? 

    We control fermentation temperatures with a water jacket on the fermenter. Honey fermentations don’t need much cooling. Our grain fermentations for whiskey production require much more heat extraction. We do not let our fermentations go to malolactic.

     

    What's the ABV you get after fermentation? 

    Approx 12%.

     

    You say you never heat the honey prior to fermentation, would heating it make it lose flavor/blow off volatile aromatics? (If I'm making a honey simple syrup should I not heat the water?) 

    This is a hard question to answer without a deep conversation. In short, it really depends on the honey. The botanical influence of the bees foraging varies significantly between honeys. As a general rule, keep the honey raw (below 110 degrees) when possible.

    Obviously, our distillation process cooks our honey, but that occurs after fermentation. We’ve found it crucial to keep the honey raw during fermentation to develop and accentuate flavors that will stay intact through distillation.

     

    105482665_3332294440116550_6815040999433764063_o

     

    And if you don't heat it and you do add water, is it very hard to mix? What do you use to mix it? Do you need specialized equipment for handling honey? It all seems incredibly sticky. 

    In our early days, it was a food grade shovel, bucket, electric drill, and a paint paddle with many trips up the ladder to the top of the fermenter. It was sticky and backbreaking, but it worked. We’ve added some fancy honey pumps and circulation lines in our fermenters that have made our lives a little easier. The honey is a sugar so with enough movement, it’ll dissolve. Keeping it raw certainly adds some challenges, but it’s essential for the finished spirit.  

     

    When purchasing huge volumes of honey as you do, how does that honey come? In what sort of container? 

    Beautiful reused and dented metal drums. Beekeepers never throw them away, they just keep traveling around the world. Even local honey is often delivered with old stickers and labels from all over the world.

     

    Clearly as a vodka, you distill the fermented honey up to 95% to be a member of the category. I remember researching a while back to find that there wasn't a standardized terminology for what you'd call a lower-ABV honey distillate (other than "honey spirit") – some brands were calling their products "honey rum" for example. I'm wondering if you've heard any sort of consensus on this or your opinion on what to call honey spirit that isn't distilled to the vodka ABV?

    I’ve heard a handful of terms. My favorite is Somel. This is an initiative led by a handful of distillers working with honey. https://somel.org/

     

    Thanks to Caledonia Spirits for answering my questions!

     

    101387028_3266727603339901_2985417413668896768_o

     

  • Getting Nerdy About Soju Production: Sticky Rice, Nuruk Fermentation, Multi ABVs, Korean Production

    I received an email from a newish soju brand Tokki Soju with a really interesting story. Given the technical skill of one of the founders, I thought I could get some additional information, and that's just what happened. 

    First, the background:

    The brand was launched in 2016 by Founder Brandon “Bran” Hill and CEO Douglas Park and currently includes two soju offerings in its portfolio: the White Label (23% ABV) and the Black Label (40% ABV). 

    Armed with a BS in Molecular Biology, Tokki Founder Brandon “Bran” Hill moved to South Korea in 2011 to study traditional Korean fermentation and distilling. After receiving a Masters in Korean Traditional Alcohols at Susubori Academy, and having put some time in at a Korean yeast bank, he returned home to become the Head Brewer for Van Brunt Stillhouse in Brooklyn, NY. While at VBS, Bran began distilling soju as a passion project, and by 2016, the first bottles were hitting the shelves of NYC liquor stores.

     

    Unnamed-1

     

    What Is Soju and How is Tokki Different 

    Soju is a Korean distilled spirit that was traditionally made with rice, however during the Korean War, when rice was banned, most soju producers were forced to switch to alternative starches like wheat, sweet potatoes and tapioca. Although the ban was lifted in the 1990’s, many of the best selling brands in Korea still use alternative starches and chemicals to replicate the taste. Tokki Soju is the first American small-batch rice soju. Tokki is made with glutinous (“sticky”) rice, water, yeast and nuruk.

    Soju is not to be confused with other Asian spirits, including Shochu and Sake (both of which hail from Japan), although there are some overlapping similarities to note. For instance, all three are made from rice, however both Soju and Shochu are distilled (while sake is brewed). Shochu and Sake are made with koji (inoculated rice), while Soju is made from rice. Most mass Soju and Shochu brands are distilled from alternative starches, including barley, sweety potatoes, wheat, etc. – but Tokki remains one of the few that uses rice, and again, glutinous rice at that.

    What sets Tokki apart is that it’s the only soju brand on the market that uses glutinous (sticky) rice in the distilling process. They also hand-cultivate their own nuruk starter (a labor-intensive and costly process).

     

    Nuruk for Soju Versus Qu for Baijiu 

    Nuruk is a traditional fermentation starter meant to saccharify the rice – most soju producers do not use the traditional ‘nuruk’ starter due to the intensive labor and costs. Tokki uses hand-cultivated nuruk that takes 2-3 weeks to grow. Tokki is distilled in a copper pot still and only 35% of the run is bottled. As for the sticky rice that Tokki sources, it is all local from Chungju, where the distillery resides, and as a result, will over time have a positive effect on the local agriculture as Tokki becomes the number one purchaser.

    Nuruk in Korean alcohol seems similar to qu for Chinese spirits. I wrote about qu after a visit to China:

    Qu is a combination of mold, yeast, and bacteria. It is used not only for baijiu production but also for undistilled Chinese beverages. 

    • The mold we could say is similar to koji used in sake and shochu production. It helps break the starches in the grains down into fermentable sugars (saccharification). In whiskey, this is accomplished by adding malted barley and/or enzymes to the grains. 
    • The yeast makes alcohol, as it does in other spirits.
    • The bacteria helps in flavor development of the alcohol.

    Unnamed-2Back to nuruk: According to Wikipedia, "Microorganisms present in nuruk include Aspergillus oryzae, Rhizopus oryzae, lactic acid bacteria such as Lactobacilli, and yeasts, predominantly Pichia anomala and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Aspergillus provides the enzyme amylase, which saccharifies the rice's starches. The resulting sugars are consumed by the yeasts, producing alcohol, as well as the Lactobacilli, producing lactic acid. Rhizopus provides the enzyme protease and lipase, which break down the protein and fat in the outer layers of the rice grain (endosperm), allowing the amylase access to the starches in the inner part.

    Camper: Can you name any differences in composition/action of nuruk vs qu, and also any production differences if you know? 

    Brandon “Bran” Hill: 

    Yes, traditional nuruk is similar to qu or "big qu" as far as the method of cultivation and how it is used in a fermentation, as a saccharification enzyme. Qu is different than what we personally use, because qu has wild yeast strains and bacteria attached to it. We only want aspergillus oryzae in our nuruk for conversion purposes and consistency. So, in our case, our nuruk is more similar to koji production, except koji is cultivated on whole rice and nuruk uses milled wheat cakes.

    Camper: For other brands that use "alternative starches" and don't use nuruk, do they just add enzymes? (I see on Wikipedia that many/most mass market sojus are distilled to vodka levels then just diluted so probably!)

    Bran:

    The mass produced sojus brands (green bottle soju) do not make their soju. They operate more as bottlers of mass produced neutral spirit (like vodka) that they purchase and then add sweeteners, chemicals, and dilute before bottling. I currently do not know another soju brand that uses traditional nuruk, but not to say they don't exist, but it is rare. Brands who make their soju today, often use Japanese koji in their fermentations.

    Fermentation 

    Korean Fermentations with sticky rice and nuruk purely depend on what you are trying to do with the fermentation. There are no set times for Korean fermentations and many different styles. Lots if variables come into play that will effect what determines the end of the fermentation. For example, the style or method used to start the fermentation process, feeding the culture multiple times, temperature of the fermentation, desired attenuation of the ferment, etc. Our fermentations take about 9 days for what we are trying to accomplish.

    Sticky Rice

    Camper: Sticky rice – from a production standpoint, why sticky rice? Wikipedia says "Glutinous rice is distinguished from other types of rice by having no (or negligible amounts of) amylose, and high amounts of amylopectin (the two components of starch)." and that amylose is "hard to digest" – does this imply that fermentation with nuruk would be much easier with sticky rice than with traditional rice as amylose is harder to break down from starch into fermentable sugars? I'm kind of making a guess here.

    We tested many types of rice and combinations of rice in the beginning of Tokki, when we were deciding on a recipe. We choose to use just sticky rice or more specifically Korean Chap Ssal (잡쌀) for a few reasons. First, we knew wanted to use a Korean variety of rice for our soju. Second, for quality the flavor. Sticky rice is more glutinous and has a much sweeter and rounder flavor and feel that we prefer over other varieties of rice.

    Yes, nuruk does break down the starch and into fermentable sugars to aid the start of the fermentation process. We also pitch yeast after our nuruk is added. It is true that amylose is harder to breakdown than other starch structures, but with our practices, I personally have never had a problem with liquefaction, conversion, or hitting desired attenuation in our fermentations with sticky rice. Also, I would not say that nuruk breaks down sticky rice easier than regular rice varieties in my experience. I have had great results with nuruk applied to both types of rice and haven't personally noticed a big discrepancy favoring one over the other as far as speed and yield of the fermentation goes.

    By "hard to digest" amylose as a resistant starch on the Wikipedia page, I think they are referring to human digestion and not yeast digestion.

    Humans have a problem physically digesting amylose when eating cereal grains because its molecular structure, but when we are mashing we break down the polymer and then distill it. The end soju product does not have the same molecular structure so, doesn't effect human digestion the same way. Also, haven't had any issues with yeast propagation in the fermentations either, but like you said…sticky rice has small amounts of amylose.

    Camper; Also, is there a taste difference between using sticky and traditional rice? If so, how would you describe that difference?

    Yes, as I said above, sticky rice is more glutinous and has a much sweeter fuller flavor that translates to the distillate. We preferred this flavor and thought it was much more versatile for our product when pairing. Most other rice varieties, like Korean Meb Ssal (멥쌀) lack sweetness and are more dry, flat, and less complex when distilled.

    Why These ABVs, and Why Two Versions? 

    Camper: Bottling at two ABVs – In Korea what is the standard ABV (if there is one) – the lower or higher proof? If one or the other is standard (I think the lower proof), why did you decide to release it at two proofs in the US? I've noticed that some shochu brands have started doing this, I think to appeal to the bartender/mixology set.

    Traditional soju in the past was consumed a high abv, usually whatever it came off the still at or slightly diluted to taste. The lower abv soju trend came during war times in Korea. To make sure there was enough soju to go around to all the soldiers, they would diluted it in half to double the quantity. The trend of low abv sojus held after the war and never really went back to the high abv style, at least not for the mass market.

    There is no regulation or standard for soju abvs that you have to adhere to in Korea. You are free to release it at what expression you feel is best. Green bottle sojus have been declining in abv every year. Currently, most of the mass produced brands of soju have abv percentages that are in the teens.

    We decided to release at two different abvs. The lower abv (Tokki White) at 23%, which also comes in a smaller 375ml bottle is more for the current trend of drinking with friends paired with food. The higher abv (Tokki Black) at 40%, comes in a 750ml bottle and is more of a nod to the old style sojus and more versatile. It is great for cocktails or just by itself.

    Moving the Distillery to Korea

    In recent news, Tokki Soju just moved their distillery from Brooklyn, New York, to Chungju, Korea. They also have plans to open a tasting room later this year, as well as their flagship bar in 2021. Tokki is launching a gin and a vodka brand this summer, making them the first to distill Western spirits in South Korea. A rum brand is also planned for 2021. 

    This will be a game-changer for cocktail bars in Korea, saving them on high import costs by giving them a local option.

    The gin, Sonbi, will be distilled using citrus, flowers, and spices all native to Korea; only the juniper will be imported.

    Camper: The decision to move the operation to Korea is a unique choice. What was the reason? I'm wondering if there were business reasons/incentives (such as the ability to be the first gin/vodka as a branding move, or government tax breaks or something), versus personal/relationship ones? I see it was mentioned "since all non-Korean spirits are currently imported at extremely high tax rates" that could be a factor if you're betting on sales in Korea.

    There we many factors that went it to the move to Korea. First, you are correct, Korean importation taxes are very high on alcohol. We had an overwhelming fan base in Korea of people who wanted our products, but we were not able to come to market at a reasonable price exporting to Korea from New York. By not being able to offer a competitive price point exporting, we felt we would eliminate many demographics and send the wrong message about our mission.

    Two, we thought if we were going to elevate the Korean spirits category we should start at the source and and produce in Korea. Three, the soju market is much larger here in Korea than the US and gives us more opportunities to grow.

    Camper: Distilling – copper pot still in the US – pot with a column on top or just a pot still?

    We have a hybrid still. We can run it as a pot and as a column. We do a two phase distillation in our process where we use both styles for our soju. First, is the pot stripping run and then cleaned up and finished with the column spirit run.

    Camper: Did you move the still itself to Korea or get a new one?

    We got a brand new still. We are using a much larger system now compared to our Brooklyn operation days. It is double the capacity of our old still.(1500 liters)

    Camper: Assuming the soju will be made the same in the new distillery (it's a new distillery right?), did you get a new still for the vodka/gin – maybe not as I see the vodka base is rice plus GNS – are you planning to do self-distilled rice spirit plus GNS for the vodka? And for the gin is it just GNS or rice spirit in there too? 

    Yes, we have a new facility.

    We did need a hybrid still to continue our same soju recipe, but it is great for a wide range of spirits. Our gin and vodka recipes are not finalized yet. We are in the trial and testing phases for both and looking forward to locking them down this year.

    I can tell you that our vodka will be made with local sticky rice as well and our gin will most likely not contain rice, but will consist of botanicals unique to Korea that I have not seen in a gin before, like kul (귤) for example, which is a variety of Mandarin orange grown on the Korean island of Jeju.

     

    Unnamed

     

  • Quinine and Tonic – New Info from Just the Tonic Book

    412DpHeawsL._SX354_BO1 204 203 200_I recently read the book, Just the Tonic: A Natural History of Tonic Water by Kim Walker and Mark Nesbitt. As you know, I also wrote a self-published book about the history of the Gin & Tonic, but mine doesn't have the rich illustrations of this handsome hardbound book – and this book brings forth a lot of new-to-me information about quinine, tonic water, and its use in alcoholic beverages. 

    As this book was written by actual botanists/herbalists and published by Kew Gardens, they brought to light a few things I missed or on which I was mistaken. It also confirmed many theories I was iffy on.

    This blog post is some of my notes from what I highlighted in the book.  

    • Humans learn about medication from plants by observing self-medication by wild animals. (This hadn't occurred to me.)
    • Cinchona was often confused with another medicinal tree, the quinaquina or Peruvian balsam. (I thought cinchona was the same as quinaquina.)
    • Talbor's remedy also contained opium. 
    • Cinchona bark as a cure for fevers contradicted Galenic medicine – fevers should be treated by cooling remedies, but the bitterness of bark means that it is a heating remedy. 
    • Some additional treatments for malaria pre-cinchona included gentian, agrimony, and barley water. 
    • There are 25 species of cinchona. 
    • Quinine is still used in some cases of lupus and rheumatoid arthritis. 
    • The Hippocratic corpus assigns different mineral waters distinct properties for different maladies. 
    • Up to the 1760s aerated waters didn't contain sodium bicarbonate. Richard Bewley (of Bewley's Mephitic Julep fame) found that sodium bicarbonate helped the absorption of fixed air (carbon dioxide).
    • Cinchona was not only used to treat malaria but also dysentery, sore throat, toothache, smallpox, tremors, and (externally) baldness. 
    • **Cinchona bark in various beverages and medicines functioned "as a tonic" (this was before tonic water became associated solely with cinchona), which is basically non-essential medicine that helps strengthen the body generally rather than treat specific diseases. The electrolytes of its day, I suppose. 
    • The authors have found an earlier first reference to quinine soda! Everywhere I've seen lists Erasmus Bond's 1858 patent for Pitt's Tonic Water. But they found an 1835 advertisement for a quinine soda water produced by Hughes & Co.
    • Tonic waters initially contained sulfuric acid, which was later changed to citric acid – both of these help dissolve the quinine alkaloids.
    • The authors found new references to quinine mixed with gin (Netherlands 1841), arrack (India and Ceylon 1863), and in the rum ration about British ships (recommended by James Lind – solver of scurvy) implemented in 1803. 
    • Jerry Thomas' Bon Vivants Companion lists a recipe for fever drops that include Peruvian bark. 

    There is a lot more from the book I'll take away to use for my purposes (especially on tonic and soda water's early use in cocktails) but these are just a few highlights. 

    If you're a G&T fan, you should most definitely buy the book!

     

     

  • An Attempt at Recreating the Canned Water Method for Clear Ice

    A couple weeks back I reported on the work of Richard Newell, who sealed boiling water in mason jars in a canning system and found that it made great ice with few bubbles in a directional freezing system

    I don't have a canning system but I thought I'd give it a try with what I had around the house. It turns out I had a big jug, so I used that as my mason jar. 

    I boiled water for quite a while inside the jar inside a pot, and then went to screw on the cap of the jug – only to find that I didn't have a cap that fits the jug :( 

    IMG-8994

    So instead I transferred it to glass bottles for which I have plastic corks. As you can see, I filled these up all the way to the top before capping them. 

    IMG-8997

     

    I put the glass bottles in the freezer to cool down before transferring them to my cooler for directional freezing. As you can see, after chilling there is a lot more space in the bottle. 

    IMG-9003

     

    We know that hot water holds less air than cold water, so was this extra headspace the water reabsorbing air (meaning my corks weren't airtight) or that it pulled a vacuum as the water cooled? I'm not sure. 

    I poured the bottles into the cooler and froze it. Unfortunately, it did not appear that using boiled water "sealed" in bottles made for clearer ice than usual via directional freezing. It looks to be about 25% cloudy ice, which is normal.

    I might have to try actual mason jars and seal them as Newell did initially to know if sealing up boiled water improves clarity in ice. 

    IMG-9009

     

    The index of ice experiments page on Alcademics is here.

  • An Attempt at Clear Spheres with an Upside-Down Thermos

    Alcademics reader Andy L commented on the post about how to Make Clear Ice Balls Using a Thermos with an idea: 

    Fill the ice ball with water and set the thermos upside-down on top of it like a dunce cap. This way the ice ball mold would still be insulated on the top half: Would directional freezing allow it to freeze from the bottom-up? 

    Alas it seems not. I attempted to do this two ways:

    1. The ice ball on bottom, empty thermos upside-down on top. 
    2. The ice ball on bottom, partially-filled thermos upside-down on top. 

    The theory with the second set-up is that the water inside the thermos would provide additional insulation in case the air in the thermos wasn't doing it. 

    The set-up:

    IMG_8861

     

    The reveal. You can see that in the partially water-filled one on the left that the water remaining inside the thermos is frozen. On the right you can see where the water was pushed out the top hole as it froze. 

    IMG_8861

    The results: 

    IMG_8861

     

    In both set-ups, the cloudy part of the ice was a tornado-shaped column right up the center facing the hole (the sphere on the right is rotated sideways in the picture). So the center was the last part to freeze.

    Most likely when the first water froze it floated to the top and plugged the hole.

    Alas, it would have been great. We'll add this to the list of "experiments that didn't work" on the Index of Ice Experiments page.  

     

     

  • The Use of Fixatives in Tea-Flavored Gin: A Chat with Gerald Rowland of Coit Spirits

    It's a welcome exception to the hundreds of National Mimosa Day and other generic pitches about liquor I receive to get an email from someone who wants to talk technical details of production, and this post comes from one of them. 

    Gerald Rowland of Rowland Cellars and more relevantly Coit Spirits sent me an email teasing information about using fixatives in the recipe for his three gins that each call for tea:

    Earl Grey Gin – with black tea and bergamot 

    Cape Gin – with fermented rooibos tea (red bush)

    Caravan Gin – with tea smoked over pine needles

    He wrote, "It took 12 months research on finding the correct plant based fixatives to stabilize the tea character that typically dissipates in 4-7 days. Normal gin botanical fixatives don't work."

    Was I intrigued? Yes, yes I was. 

    Coit spirits gins8

     

    Fixatives in Gin

    In my various distillery visits over the years, distillers would say that certain botanicals act not so much as flavors on their own, but as fixatives to other desired botanicals' aromas. 

    Aaron Knoll wrote a very informative article for Distiller Magazine about fixatives in gin. I'll share a few relevant quotes:

    The New Perfume Handbook describes a fixative as an “ingredient which prolongs the retention of fragrance on skin,” and is also sometimes described as “tenacity.” The other definition is summed up by The Chemistry of Fragrances as “a property of some perfume components, usually the higher boiling ones, which enables them to fix or hold back the more volatile notes so that they do not evaporate so quickly.” A fixative keeps the scent around longer. In the world of spirit production and distillation, we’re talking about the second definition.

    The Perfume Handbook, published in 1992, lists 42 separate botanicals with fixative properties. Orris root and angelica, the two most often cited by gin distillers as being fixatives, are both present; however, so are some other common gin ingredients, such as coriander and woodruff that are rarely—if ever—granted that status.

    The article concludes:

    The literature on the topic of fixatives suggests that the effect in spirits and gin may not be big—or even there at all. 

    Furthermore, even in a profession where there is a tradition of considering fixatives in the design process, perfumer Josh Meyer explains that the process is still more artistic than analytical. 

     

    Back to Coit Spirits and Gerry Rowland. He wrote, "Most gins that have tea in their recipe usually don’t advertise it on the label (some state tea, but I have to look for it and wouldn’t have known tea was used unless I was told) as the tea is unstable and progressively dominated by the other botanicals in the recipe over time." 

    For most of the content below I have copied and pasted and moved some stuff around from Rowland's email and our back-and-forth conversation. 

     

    Tea is in the Tails

    Black & Red teas brew at 200-212F to release their flavor [just below the boiling point of water], but London dry gin distillations are usually 176-185 F [just above the boiling point of alcohol].

    The tea notes in my experience will not come over unless it comes with the water late in the distillation. I have found the tea is water soluble, not alcohol soluble.

    To achieve this higher wash temp you use a lower ABV wash so the temp is higher to bring the spirit over. There is a second benefit at higher wash temperature, in that there is a true Maillard reaction of the botanicals in the wash providing a complex natural sweetness so these tea gins are made without adding sugar and yet still friendly to the palate putting them in a sip-able arena. 

    The tea [notes] comes over late in the distillation, usually after the tails cut of most London Dry Gin recipes as the root/bark botanicals are too harsh, triggering the earlier tails cut. The solution was to break away from traditional botanicals that trigger an early tails cut so you can capture the tea notes avoiding the harsh flavored botanicals.

    In other words, some botanicals of traditional gins would need to be left behind so that they didn't interfere with the tea notes in the tails cut. 

    Tea Fixatives in Gin

    I spent as much time solving this as I did working on the recipe and the above. The tea molecules are highly charged and bind with the other botanicals. In doing so there is a polymerization of botanical molecules that provide mouthfeel but the tea definition is lost as the molecule gets too large for our sensors to perceive them. This usually takes 4-7 days and occurs if the tea is distilled or steeped. 

    After 4-7 days steeping you have tannin expression but the subtle character of an individual leaf is lost. This fine tea character loss occurs irrespective if you steep in water or distill, the tea character immediately starts degrading post production of the liquid and after 4-7 days lapse post production the fine tea notes are gone.

    When distilling with tea the tails cut is before the tannin comes over so you capture the essence of the fine tea character note without the aggressive tannin body of the tea.

    So the tails cut of the gin is between the tea flavor and the tannins, if tannins come over at all in distillation. 

    There is an argument I have heard that gin doesn’t need fixatives, this might be true for spirit-based aromas & flavors of London Dry gins, but for water-based aromas & flavors missed in most LDGs (London Dry Gins) because of the earlier tails cut. In my experience I find them critical for water based aromas & botanicals. People who make tea extracts find the same as does the perfume industry and why we have fixatives from a century old industry.

    There may be a case that if you don’t have any water based flavors & aromas that fixatives don’t matter and this may be true for many LDGs. 

    For me the solution was to look to the perfume industry at fixative botanicals that the right lock & key configuration to bind onto the tea molecules active polarized sites to keep it a small and discrete molecule blocking its charged receptor sights from other botanicals. Although this creates a stable molecule larger than the tea molecule it is still small enough that we can perceive it with our sensors.

    Trial and Error and Three Fixatives

    When I look at a fixative being successful for Coit Gin it has needed to both protect the aroma and promote lingering. 

    The perfume industry uses the fixatives at much higher rates being at 100-1000 times higher than the rate I use in Coit gin to achieve tea stability. Fixatives in perfume can affect the product in 3 or more ways.

    1) They can be an ingredient directly providing an aroma.

    2) Provide fixative qualities to unstable aromas, protecting the aroma character.

    3) Increasing the persistence intensity and lingering ability of an aroma.

    As far as fixative use in Coit gin it’s for stability its strictly points 2&3 from above, protecting aroma character & increasing the longevity or persistence of the aroma.

    It took three fixatives botanicals to truly achieve stability and that were FDA-approved for consumption, as perfumes are topical whereas gin is internal. This took multiple parallel experiments to determine the rate of each fixative with each other.

    The first fixative took stability out to 30 days at which time a small change was noted indicating a second fixative was required as more of the first fixative didn’t help. The second fixative extended the stability out to 90 days with a small change requiring a third fixative. The third fixative achieved stability.

    If these experiments had been done consecutively instead of parallel it would take 1-2 decades before you would have these results. I tested many more than the 3 final plant based botanical fixatives when I went into production as no single fixative would do the job.

    Once we worked out the maximum levels to prove stability we had to retest to minimum levels so the fixative botanicals did their job but did not influence the character of the recipe.

    Parallels in Perfumery

    I asked Rowland if he could share any examples of perfume fixatives (certain he wouldn't want to reveal the specific three used in Coit gins) so that we could have an idea of how they work. He wrote: 

    I provide the following selection as an example from Eden Botanicals

    Note: I make no representation as to their FDA approval for use in USA.

    Some Common Fixatives:

    Amyris: Has a very tenacious, rich, complex odor that quickly fades out to a weak woody-balsamic scent, but is still a well-known fixative; it finds extensive application as a mild blender in numerous types of perfumes and blends well with lavandin, oakmoss, citronella, rose, Virginia cedarwood, etc.

    Clary Sage: Has an herbal-sweet, nut-like fragrance with unusual tenacity; somewhat heavy with a balsamic, ambergris-like dryout reminiscent of tobacco, sweet hay, and tea leaves. An excellent fixative that can be used with perfumes of a more delicate bouquet, and with bergamot, cedarwood, citronella, cognac, cypress, geranium, frankincense, grapefruit, jasmine, juniper, labdanum, lavender, lime, and sandalwood.

    Liquidambar (Styrax): Has a very rich, sweet-balsamic, faintly floral, somewhat spicy aroma, with a peculiar styrene topnote and resinous, animalic, amber-like undertones; to be used most sparingly and has excellent fixative qualities. An important element in lilac, narcissus, jonquil, hyacinth, jasmine, tuberose, and wisteria bases; it also blends well with ylang-ylang, rose, lavender, carnation, violet, cassie and spice oils. Benign solvent (ethanol) extracted Resinoid.

    Oakmoss: Has a heavy, rich earthy-mossy, bark-like and extremely tenacious fragrance with a high fixative value; blends well with virtually all other oils, including lavender and ylang-ylang. Used to lend body and rich natural undertones to all perfume types.

    The Choice of Fixatives for Coit Gins

    On the brand's website, they list that there are 10 botanicals in the Earl Grey gin. I asked if the three final fixatives were counted among them. 

    The fixative botanicals are counted separate as they are at so low rates and don’t contribute flavor. My mindset was when I provide the botanical number it is about botanicals that provide the flavor and you could identify in the gin spirit.

    I asked if the fixatives in Coit gins are detectable flavors, or if they're purely functional. 

    It took many months once finding the 3 to achieve the absolute minimum required of each when working in conjunction with each other.

    At these low levels if I increase a fixative botanical rate I can see a change in expression of the tea notes but cannot pick the characteristic of the fixative itself. So the rates at these low levels are very critical. Different rates will have different effects. Fixatives are very dynamic on their rate of use effect as to protecting the aroma, persistence of the aroma and subtly influencing the aroma it is working on to swing it from a slightly savory floral note to a slightly sweeter floral note.

    All 3 fixatives originate from plants i.e. root, leaf, flower, bark, stem. I also tested many highly processed plant compounds and other non-plant compounds to see what worked best, but none of the alternatives were as good as the 3 I found. In Coit’s case I was fortunate with the 3 that I found, were all of plant origin and in alignment of my mindset of a natural, vegan friendly product.

    I didn't get the vegan-friendly thing until I later read the fixative article in Distiller magazine linked above, which states, "Throughout the history of perfume, the most important fixatives have been heavy, animal-derived products. Musk from civets and ambergris from whales are among those derived from fauna, however, distillers tend to draw their fixative heritage from the flora side of things."

    So all of that is very interesting, and nothing I'd spent much time thinking about previously. I hope you enjoyed geeking out with me. 

     

    Other Products

    Worth mentioning is that Coit Spirits also has a bourbon on the market and potentially a fourth gin on the way. 

    The bourbon is as transparent as the gin. From the website:

    Indiana Straight Bourbon Whiskey, High Rye, Four Grain, 49% ABV

    Distilled and aged on site in Indiana at MGP 

    Unique for MGP is the 4 grain bourbon, the corn and rye provide the backbone, the wheat uplifts both aroma & flavor, and the barley harmonizes the three.

    Straight Bourbon Whiskey, straight from the barrel, assembled, proofed and into the bottle. No charcoal or cold filtration. 49% ABV

     

    And about that fourth gin we may see in the future:

    I am also working on a truly indigenous gin to the Pacific Ocean and coastal Pacific Ranges of the West Coast USA. I am 2+ years into this recipe and 80% there but still working on the finish.

    Some producers have a ‘local or native gin’ these usually contain botanicals that were never indigenous to their region with local but ‘introduced botanicals’ or cross bred sub species; for example a citrus developed/cross bred in Riverside so technically from the USA, but citrus as a species never existed indigenously in the USA in the first place.

    So credit to those producers for being creative but it highlights the difficulty in a truly indigenous recipe that I am working as opposed to native or local.

     

    I look forward to trying the gins (and bourbon) out now and the native gin down the line. 

     

    Coit spirits gins6

  • Canning Water to Degas it for Clearer Ice

    Today's post comes from the work of reader Richard Newell. We'll call it the "canned water" technique for improving ice clarity. 

    We know that the cloudiness in ice comes mostly from trapped air and impurities, which usually are pushed to the center of an ice cube when it freezes. The technique of directional freezing just relocates the air to one end of an ice cube/block rather than eliminates it. [see all the ice posts on Alcademics here]

    Many people have attempted degassing the water to remove the air in various ways – mostly by boiling it, but others have tried putting it under a vacuum. As far as I know, nobody has been successful at fully degassing water so that the ice made with it comes out perfectly clear. 

    Today's post unfortunately isn't a fully-degassed ice system either, but it does seem to point to a fairly large visible improvement by using water that has been "canned" – using a canning technique but canning water alone appears to improve the clarity of ice made with that water. Newell used an Instant Pot to do the canning, making it super easy. Traditionally-canned water also works. 

    Let's start with Newell's conclusions:

    • Vacuum is a good (if not essential) method of home degassing of water [in an Instant Pot]
    • "Canning" is a convenient way to "pull a vacuum" on water with simple equipment
    • A pressure cooker is not required to get good results
    • Distilled water makes little or no difference (assuming your starting water is not too bad)
    • Boiling (without a vacuum) does not do an adequate job of degassing [without sealing].
    • All of my results also depend upon top-down freezing.

    The below image is of "canned water" that was cooled and then set into aluminum thermoses to freeze with directional freezing. Note that there's just a tiny amount of cloudy water at the bottom. 

    Unnamed

    This is compared with non-degassed water in the same thermoses:

    Non-degassed

     

    We went back and forth in email so this is an edited version of a series of emails and later experiments. Newell says:

    I have had success in removing the gas in the water using a combination of boiling and vacuum with various set-ups, some more complicated and labor intensive than others. Then, I discovered this simple and nearly foolproof technique: Use traditional canning techniques and "can" the water in a pressure cooker. Especially with an instant pot type cooker this is dirt simple and doesn't require much labor or monitoring.

    Then, I use the top-down freezing technique to make blocks of ice that I then mold into spheres. [The image above is "canned water" frozen inside insulated thermos, so directional freezing from top-down.]

    I use filtered water, mainly since the local tap water tastes so bad. I fill some mason jars with the water with a 1 to 1.5 inch head-space, put on the lids and rings "finger tight" only and set them in a water bath in the cooker.

    I put them in the electric pressure cooker for at least the 8 minute automatic cycle, and walk away until it completes. When it is done, I release any remaining pressure, remove the jars, and fully tighten the bands.

    As you can see, there are no bubbles, and the top-down freezing left almost no minerals in the top section of the ice. The bottom-most part, is of course, cloudy. After a lot of experiments, too numerous to detail, this method is the most simple and foolproof I have found.

    I confirmed that Newell was using glass jars, not fully filled with water and not submerged completely in water, and that there is air headspace in the jar when he does it. This is important because my assumption would have been that any headspace in the jar would contain air that would reabsorb into the water. 

    The head-space fills with steam during the pressure-cooking, and when the jars cool the steam condenses and creates a vacuum, sealing the lid. So, the head-space is essential to pull the vacuum used to seal the jars during cooling. The lid acts as a one-way valve: during heating the lid lets steam escape (which is why you don't tighten the bands completely before cooking; the jars might explode), and then during cooling the lid gets sucked down to the jar and seals. The drop in pressure actually causes some more of the hot water in the jar to boil as the headspace cools.

    Thus, there really is not that much air in the jar to reabsorb… the head-space is filled mostly with water vapor. I think the vacuum may help remove any remaining dissolved air in the water. I typically leave the jars sealed overnight, and freeze the water from them the next day, though I don't know for sure that this delay is necessary. But, it easily fits into my work flow and has become my habit.

    I asked why tighten the bands (the lids) at all, and just pour it into the molds at this point? 

    That might work, but I haven't tried it. I always let the jars seal and pull an internal vacuum, as I described above. The jars usually seal themselves without tightening the bands, but just to make sure, I usually still tighten them during cooling.

    Back when I was experimenting with simple boiling, I tried going direct from the stove-top to the tumbler, but it didn't really help. I suspect that the water, even when boiled for a long time, was never degassed enough. I believe that reduced pressure is an essential step, as the only experiments I have done that succeeded have all used a partial vacuum as part of the process.

    I tried boiling followed by a vacuum, and this did work well. One way I did this was with a vacuum sealer (like a Food Saver brand bag sealer) that has a vacuum pump. You can buy an attachment for most of these type devices that fits over a mason jar to pull a vacuum in it without having to heat/boil it (to seal a jar of nuts, coffee, or flour, for example). But, this was a big nuisance and a bit dangerous to use with hot water. I also experimented with valves and other complications.

    Then, I hit upon the pressure canning scheme, which boils the water (actually, at a higher temperature, due to the pressure), and pulls a vacuum inside the sealed jars during cooling, and is dirt simple.

    Then Newell did some additional experiments: 

    • Using distilled water in the same set-up
    • Rather than canning under pressure in an Instant Pot, doing the traditional canning technique that would be used to sterilize Mason jars 

    I "canned" some water using low pressure (i.e., atmospheric-only, or "no extra pressure") where the boiling point of water is about 212 F. (Note, I am near sea level). This gave essentially the same results as "high pressure" canning using a conventional pressure cooker, or equivalently, an electric pressure cooker like an Instant Pot, that adds about 15 psi and hence water has a higher boiling point (about 250 F.).

    Note that I have a grate at the bottom of the pot to lift the jars a bit off of the bottom of the pan. As anyone who has done much canning knows, if you put the jars directly on the bottom of the pan over the heat, the violence of the boiling can break the jars.

    I boiled this for roughly 20 minutes, to make sure the water in the jars reached the full boiling point. Then, I removed the jars and fully tightened the bands, and let them cool. 

    The results after top-down freezing look essentially identical to when I used the high pressure cooker (see below). Nice and clear with no bubbles except the artifacts at the bottom. 

    Traditional Canning Set-up and Resulting Ice:

    Non-pressure de-gassed iceNon-pressure de-gassed ice

    One more experiment, using the "canned water" technique with distilled water. 

    Finally, I also ran an experiment with distilled water. I took a quart of my usual filtered water and distilled a pint of "extra pure" water from it. This I ran through my usual pressure-canning de-gassing process, and then froze it. Here is the result (below). The distilling made no noticeable difference. Still clear in the middle (due to the de-gassing), but still having the same artifacts at the bottom after top-down freezing.

    So, you don't need a pressure cooker to de-gas the water. A simple pot and a mason jar will do the trick. Distilling is a waste of effort.

    Distilled de-gassed ice

    Another conclusion 

    My belief is that as long as the jars seal and form an internal vacuum during cooling, the results will be satisfactory.

    In conclusion, it appears in this set-up is effective at reducing cloudiness in ice.

     

    Analysis

    If the pressure in the canning step in the Instant Pot is not crucial, then perhaps the main factor is that after boiling, the mason jars are sealed. Many of us ice nerds have tried boiling the water and then freezing it (with some improvement in clarity but in my estimation not worth the added effort)

    So it appears that the sealed water doesn't reabsorb nearly as much air when kept under a vacuum as it would when cooling from boiling unsealed. I had always figured that water would naturally reabsorb most of the air when it was cooled to come to equilibrium (after being sealed or not), but maybe not!

    This makes me want to do a bunch of experiments (or, you know, inspire you to do some experiments and share your results):

    1. Repeat this "canned water" method just to verify it works for others
      1. The ideal set-up would be a double-walled aluminum or other deformable container that could be canned and then put into the freezer while still sealed. 
      2. Or I suppose we could just sacrifice a mason jar – can the water and then make an insulated sleeve for the mason jar to encourage directional freezing.
    2. Repeat this "canned water" method but put the water in an Igloo cooler set-up like we do for traditional directional freezing to see if it improves ice clarity.
      1. This should be compared with boiled, uncanned water.
      2. It's possible that the large surface area of the cooler would allow for more reabsorption of air into the water as it freezes.
        1. If this experiment fails, it would be interesting to try putting some sort of lid or just a layer of plastic wrap on top of the water to see if it improves clarity. Actually it would be interesting to do this with just regular water/boiled water! 
    3. Buy some commercial canned water like this or this,  though I wouldn't really expect them to have been canned at high temperatures. 
      1. And see what happens when your stick it in the freezer. Likely the can would burst as water expands when it turns into ice, but then cut open the can to see the cloudiness of the ice inside. 
      2. Or get it super cold first, then open the can and transfer it to a directional freezing system.

     

    So… long post and lots of homework, but it's been a while since anyone seems to have come up with an improved technique so let's get to work. Thanks much to Richard Newell for doing the work and sharing it with us. 

     

    The index of ice experiments page on Alcademics is here.

     

  • Cherries Frozen Into Ice Balls

    This came out great!

    Using this technique with the Thermos Funtainer and ice ball molds I put some cherries inside ice ball molds atop the Thermos and froze them. 

    Nothing complicated, these looked awesome.

    IMG-8755
    IMG-8755
    IMG-8755

    For all the clear ice projects on Alcademics, check out the Index of Ice Experiments page

  • Ice Blocks with Objects: Sharks and Sunglasses

    While sheltering-in-place at home, I've taken to doing some (more) silly ice projects. For these I used the basic Igloo cooler method and placing objects near the top of the water line so that they'd freeze into the clear part of the ice after freezing. 

    For the sunglasses, I rested a stick over the top of the cooler and tapes the sides to it so that the lenses were in the water. 

    For the shark, as you can see I stood it upright in the cooler (originally taped to the same stick) and let the clear ice freeze downward.

    In both cases I removed the block from the cooler before it was fully frozen (2-3 days) so that there would be only clear ice.

     

    Sunglasses In Ice Block  - 23
    Sunglasses In Ice Block  - 23
    Sunglasses In Ice Block  - 23
    Sunglasses In Ice Block  - 23

     

     

    Shark In Ice Block  - 55
    Shark In Ice Block  - 55
    Shark In Ice Block  - 55
    Shark In Ice Block  - 55
    Shark In Ice Block  - 55
    Shark In Ice Block  - 55

     

     

  • A New Book on Chartreuse Corrects the History of the Brand

    2AF7ED1D-A044-4FE2-B9B1-3D53BC6831D3Chartreuse, a liqueur made by Carthusian monks with a recipe dating to 1605, has been made in 6 different distilleries in France and Spain over the centuries. The monks dedicated to its production do so in silence and isolation, while the brand Chartreuse is run by an outside company. They handle the sales and marketing and all that jazz. 

    While the marketing company has done their best to put the brand history on their website and keep their importers and brand ambassadors trained on it, this was done largely without much input of the fathers of the order. So finally the marketing company and the fathers got together and produced a brand book that includes brand history, special bottlings, and other information. The monks looked into their vaults and records. 

    I have a copy of the book but haven't had time to read it yet. At a book launch event in San Francisco, we learned that in writing this new book they learned a lot of new information – and past misinformation about the brand history. One fact they brought up is that they had a special anniversary release bottling a few years back but then just learned that it was on the wrong anniversary and they were something like 50 years off.

    Also the dates on the various monasteries/distilleries where Chartreuse was made have all been adjusted. I was working with Tim Master who works for the US importer on brand history a bit over a year ago for a project and getting really detailed info versus what was publicly available, but even that information was slightly off since he'd not yet had access to the info in this book.   I wrote up a blog post about the location and dates of all the Chartreuse monasteries, but it turns out all the dates were slightly off so I need to update that post. 

    At the book launch they gave us bookmarks with all the distillery dates and locations on it so a quick check revealed where I was off. I'll need to do a super thorough review of what I wrote about the brand's history (I think I wrote about 4000 words on it) after reviewing this new book. 

    So where do I get this book, you ask? There's only one place: It's available for sale at CocktailKingdom.com

    The book is about 350 pages with a history, photos, timelines, etc. For a booze history nerd, it seems pretty essential. 

    896F0C67-7ADD-41CE-9878-A329B7D29F88
    896F0C67-7ADD-41CE-9878-A329B7D29F88
    896F0C67-7ADD-41CE-9878-A329B7D29F88

agave alcademics Angostura bartenders bitters bodega bourbon bowmore Campari Camper English chartreuse clear clear ice cocktail cocktail powder cocktails cognac curacao dehydrated dehydrated liqueurs dehydration directional freezing distillery distillery tour distillery visit france freezing objects in ice hakushu harvest history how to make clear ice ice ice balls ice carving ice cubes ice experiments isle of jura jerez liqueur makepage making clear ice mexico midori molasses orange orange liqueur penthouse pisco potato powder production recipe Recipes rum san francisco scotch scotch whisky sherry spain spirits sugar sugarcane sweden tales of the cocktail tequila tour triple sec visit vodka whiskey whisky